BAKU, Azerbaijan, November 7. In the pursuit of decarbonization, it is crucial to recognize that not all Carbon Dioxide Removals (CDRs) can be equally distributed, Trend reports via the Oxford Institute of energy Studies (OIES).
The availability of nature-based and engineered solutions heavily depends on geological, climatic, and land area factors. To address the potential imbalances stemming from this unequal distribution, the trading of CDRs emerges as a key lever in achieving decarbonization goals.
One significant aspect of this endeavor is the need for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to acknowledge the necessity of country-to-country carbon trading to meet the objectives outlined in the Paris Agreement. Emphasizing the role of Article 6 within the agreement is paramount, a recognition that is currently lacking.
For CDRs to be deployed at scale, technological advancements in digital infrastructure and trading platforms are pivotal. Overcoming the challenges associated with carbon markets, which can be intricate and technically demanding to administer, necessitates the integration of technology. Advanced digital solutions have the potential to streamline the identification of suitable CDR technologies for specific sectors, pinpoint regions where carbon trading is most applicable, and facilitate the establishment of mutually beneficial bilateral agreements between nations.
Illustrating this concept, initiatives like the Climate Action Data Trust, which employs blockchain-powered digital infrastructure to link registries and provide public access to information, play a vital role in harmonizing markets. They enhance transparency in carbon credit transactions, reduce the risk of double counting, and overall bolster integrity in the voluntary carbon market. Notably, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has exemplified the influence of technology by announcing its plans to develop a national carbon credit system using blockchain technology.
The final aspect of consideration revolves around the importance of integrated capacity building. In contrast to previous transitions, the ongoing energy transition is a managed process, demanding a comprehensive understanding and integration across sectors and stakeholders. Governments must establish frameworks that incorporate input from a broad spectrum of stakeholders, including the private sector, academia, and customers, to ensure that carbon trading platforms operate within a framework that maximizes their effectiveness in realizing the goals of the Paris Agreement.
Follow the author on X: @Lyaman_Zeyn